Comparative Efficacy of General and Regional Anesthesia in Cataract Surgeries: Impact on Postoperative Visual Acuity and Recovery
Background: Cataract surgery is a widely performed procedure globally, and the choice of anesthesia general anesthesia (GA) or regional anesthesia (RA) significantly impacts postoperative outcomes, recovery, and patient satisfaction. Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of GA and RA in cataract surgeries, focusing on postoperative visual acuity, recovery times, patient satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. Methods: A total of 155 patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomly assigned to GA (n=78) or RA (n=77). Primary outcomes included postoperative visual acuity and recovery times, while secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, incidence of complications, and cost analysis. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric statistical tests. Results: At 24 hours, RA achieved better visual acuity (62% achieving 6/9 or better) compared to GA (48%, p=0.04). By 1 week and 1-month, visual outcomes were comparable. RA demonstrated shorter recovery times, with a mean hospital stay of 8 ± 3 hours versus 12 ± 4 hours for GA (p<0.01), and 92% of RA patients ambulating within 4 hours compared to 74% for GA (p<0.01). RA patients reported higher satisfaction (89% rated excellent/very good vs. 76% in GA, p=0.02). Minor complications were slightly higher in the RA group (6% vs. 3%, p=0.17), but not statistically significant. Conclusions: It is concluded that RA provides significant advantages over GA in cataract surgeries, including faster recovery, higher satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness, while achieving comparable visual outcomes. Anesthesia choice should be personalised to patient-specific factors and clinical contexts for optimal results.