Background: Life expectancy of people who are infected with Human immune deficiency virus are most important in providing valuable information to patients regarding their prognosis in long term, in estimating the future costs associated with HIV related care, in predicting the probable future socioeconomic and demographic impact of HIV. The life anticipation gauges of HIV positive grown-ups in developing countries have been distributed, and numerous of these thinks about have appeared critical enhancements in life hope after the presentation of highly active antiretroviral treatment (cART). Materials And Methods: This is a Descriptive and Cross sectional study. Clinical epidemiological profile was collected from patient file available in ART centre as mentioned in annexure 1 was assessed by WHO questionnaire as mentioned in annexure 2. Study was initiated after approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. Study related procedures and enrolment of eligible subjects was done only after obtaining an informed consent from the patient. Confidentiality of patient’s details was maintained at all levels using appropriate coding. Subjects fulfilling inclusion & exclusion criteria were enrolled in to the study. 300 records were collected from ART centre KMC Attavar ID clinic ART centre who are on cART for A minimum of ten years. Results: In age distribution 18 to 20 years are 2%, 21 to 30 are 15%, 31 to 40 50.3%, 41 to 50 are 24.3%, 51 to 60 are 6.7%, 61 to 70 are 1.3% and 71 to 80 are 1%. This indicates main age group affected is between 31 to 40 years indicating young age group is mainly affected. 70% were male patients and 30% were female indicating more number of HIV cases in male population. 93.3% of HIV patients were heterosexual, 2 % were homosexual, 4.7% was mother to child transmission. 42% of HIV+ve patients had reactive or HIV +ve spouses and 29% had non-reactive spouses whereas it was not applicable for28.7 % (unmarried /widowed). 53.3% of HIV +ve cases did not have any opportunistic infections. i.e. approximately 47% had opportunistic infections.16.7% of HIV +ve cases had pulmonary Tuberculosis followed by extra pulmonary tuberculosis being 9.3% and pulmonary TB with candidiasis being 4.3 %. Conclusion: In our study Major age group affected are between age 31-40 years. In our study we found increased incidence of HIV infection in males, in rural areas and in low education statuses peoples. Most common mode of transmission was sexual (heterosexual mode). CD4 count improved after initiating patient on cART. Incidence of Opportunistic infections has decreased in those who were on cART.
Life expectancy of people who are infected with Human immune deficiency virus are most important in providing valuable information to patients regarding their prognosis in long term, in estimating the future costs associated with HIV related care, in predicting the probable future socioeconomic and demographic impact of HIV.(1).
The life anticipation gauges of HIV positive grown-ups in developing countries have been distributed, and numerous of these thinks about have appeared critical enhancements in life hope after the presentation of highly active antiretroviral treatment (cART) (2)
Studies have appeared diminishing rates of AIDS related death compared to non-AIDS related death since the introduction of cART & described a require for increasing eye on chronic disease treatment & wellbeing advancement (3)
There's confirmation with immunologic strength with age and age at cART treatment has been connected with the rate and degree of immunologic change. The impacts of aging on survival hence got to be considered in expansion to the impacts of expanded length of infection. (4) However studies of overall life expectancy in HIV positive people are often limited by insufficient data in old age groups were rapid increase in general individual mortality are seen. There remains a ought to great get it of long term survival in elderly HIV+ve individuals after delayed cART. (5) There's expanded chances of getting HIV in people who have sex men with men, for ladies the hetero transmission rate is around 90%. (6)
Sticking to treatment & an imperceptible HIV RNA viral stack are most critical indicators of mortality but there are male & female contrasts that make these endpoints troublesome to victory in defenseless individuals. (7) For 20 yrs, combination antiretroviral treatment (cART) has been the standard approach to treating HIV-1 contamination in Europe and North America. (8) The primary ART regimens were second rate to those as of now accessible, which superior smother HIV replication, are less poisonous, and have higher hereditary obstructions to resistance, diminished pill burden (frequently one a day), and less side-effects.(9)
Therefore, individuals living with HIV who begun c ART more as of late might have progressed survival compared with those treated prior within the ART era. (10)
The WHO gauges that almost 3 million individuals were receiving cART in lower and moderate income nations by the conclusion of 2007, a 7.5- fold increment amid the past four years. (11) Utilizing information from a arrange of ART treatment programs in resource limited settings, we found that on normal 21% of patients had been misplaced to programmes in the primary 6 months after beginning ART. So also, a systematic review of ART programs in sub-Saharan Africa found that about 40% of patients were misplaced at 2 yrs, with huge variety in retention rates between programmes. (12)
AIM:
“To study the Clinico-epidemiological Profile of people living with HIV (PLHIV) on minimum 10 years of Combination ARV therapy (c ART)”
This is a Descriptive and Cross sectional study. Clinical epidemiological profile was collected from patient file available in ART centre as mentioned in annexure 1 was assessed by WHO questionnaire as mentioned in annexure 2.
Study Setting:
Out/inpatient patients of hospitals affiliated to Kasturba medical college, Mangalore i.e.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Data Collection Methodology:
Study was initiated after approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. Study related procedures and enrolment of eligible subjects was done only after obtaining an informed consent from the patient. Confidentiality of patient’s details was maintained at all levels using appropriate coding.
Subjects fulfilling inclusion & exclusion criteria were enrolled in to the study. 300 records were collected from ART centre KMC Attavar ID clinic ART centre who are on ART for A minimum of ten years.
Table 1 Shows age distribution in PL HIV
Age in years |
Frequency |
percentage |
18-20 |
6 |
2.0 |
21-30 |
45 |
15.0 |
31-40 |
151 |
50.3 |
41-50 |
73 |
24.3 |
51-60 |
20 |
6.7 |
61-70 |
4 |
1.3 |
71-80 |
1 |
0.3 |
Total |
300 |
100 |
In age distribution 18 to 20 years are 2%, 21 to 30 are 15%, 31 to 40 50.3%, 41 to 50 are 24.3%, 51 to 60 are 6.7%, 61 to 70 are 1.3% and 71 to 80 are 1%. This indicates main age group affected is between 31 to 40 years indicating young age group is mainly affected.
Table 2 Shows frequency of HIV cases in association with sex of the individuals
SEX |
|||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
|
Male |
210 |
70.0 |
Female |
90 |
30.0 |
|
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
70% were male patients and 30% were female indicating more number of HIV cases in male population.
Table 3 Shows frequency of HIV cases associated with mode of transmission
MODE OF TRANSMISSION |
|||
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
|
|
Heterosexual |
280 |
93.3 |
Homosexual |
6 |
2.0 |
|
Mother to child |
14 |
4.7 |
|
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
93.3% of HIV patients were heterosexual, 2 % were homosexual, 4.7% was mother to child transmission.
Table 4 Shows frequency of HIV cases in association with spouse infected status
SPOUSE STATUS
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Reactive |
126 |
42.0 |
Non-reactive |
88 |
29.3 |
None |
86 |
28.7 |
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
42% of HIV+ve patients had reactive or HIV +ve spouses and 29% had non-reactive spouses whereas it was not applicable for28.7 % (unmarried /widowed)
Table 5 shows frequency of different opportunistic infections in HIV+ve patients.
Opportunistic Infections
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Nil |
160 |
53.3 |
PTB |
50 |
16.7 |
Extra pulmonary TB |
28 |
9.3 |
Disseminated TB |
1 |
.3 |
Candidiasis |
5 |
1.7 |
Toxoplasmosis |
4 |
1.3 |
PCP |
9 |
3.0 |
CMV |
6 |
2.0 |
HSV |
4 |
1.3 |
VZV |
1 |
.3 |
MAC |
2 |
.7 |
PTB, Candidiasis |
13 |
4.3 |
PTB, CMV |
2 |
.7 |
PTB, HSV |
3 |
1.0 |
Multiple |
12 |
4.0 |
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
53.3% of HIV +ve cases did not have any opportunistic infections. i.e. approximately 47% had opportunistic infections.16.7% of HIV +ve cases had pulmonary Tuberculosis followed by extra pulmonary tuberculosis being 9.3% and pulmonary TB with candidiasis being 4.3 %. Many combined infections were noted.
Table 6 Shows CD4 count at diagnosis and recent with respect to Domains 1,2,3,4,5,6
|
DOMAIN 1 |
DOMAIN 2 |
DOMAIN 3 |
DOMAIN 4 |
DOMAIN 5 |
DOMAIN 6 |
|
|
R |
.023 |
.090 |
.077 |
-.017 |
.085 |
.054 |
CD4 AT DIAGNOSIS |
P |
.686 |
.119 |
.184 |
.768 |
.146 |
.354 |
|
N |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
|
R |
-.038 |
-.046 |
-.005 |
.021 |
.074 |
.058 |
RECENT CD4 COUNT 2 |
P |
.512 |
.426 |
.931 |
.722 |
.202 |
.317 |
|
N |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
298 |
Table 7 Shows Paired Samples Statistics of recent CD4 counts
|
N |
Median |
IQR |
CD4 AT DIAGNOSIS |
299 |
162.500 |
199.909 |
RECENT CD4 COUNT 1 |
299 |
598.000 |
336.000 |
RECENT CD4 COUNT 2 |
300 |
588.000 |
337.500 |
Table 8 Shows paired sample tests and paired differences
Paired Samples Test
|
Paired Differences |
Z |
P |
|
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
|||
CD4 AT DIAGNOSIS - RECENT CD4 COUNT 1 |
-426.538 |
314.802 |
- 23.429 |
<0.001 vhs |
CD4 AT DIAGNOSIS - RECENT CD4 COUNT 2 |
-397.347 |
284.572 |
- 24.185 |
<0.001 vhs |
RECENT CD4 COUNT 1 - RECENT CD4 COUNT 2 |
30.204 |
162.400 |
3.216 |
<0.001 vhs |
Table 9 shows distribution of HIV and no. of years on ART
NO OF YRS ON ART
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
10 |
28 |
9.3 |
11 |
88 |
29.3 |
12 |
122 |
40.7 |
13 |
60 |
20.0 |
14 |
2 |
.7 |
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
Table 10 Shows frequency of HIV cases on Combined ART regimen
c ART REGIMEN
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
ZLN |
202 |
67.3 |
ZLE |
30 |
10.0 |
TLE |
55 |
18.3 |
TLN |
2 |
.7 |
d4T+L+E |
1 |
.3 |
ALE/ALN |
6 |
2.0 |
PI |
3 |
1.0 |
TL+LPV/r |
1 |
.3 |
Total |
300 |
100.0 |
In our study age distribution 18 to 20 years are 2%, 21 to 30 are 15%, 31 to 40 50.3%, 41 to 50 are 24.3%, 51 to 60 are 6.7%, 61 to 70 are 1.3% and 71 to 80 are 1%. This indicates main age group affected is between 31 to 40 years (50.30%) indicating young age group is mainly affected. According to study on Estimate of HIV prevalence and number of people living with HIV in India 2008–2009 Arvind Pandey, Damodar Sahu, Taoufi Bakkali, DCS Reddy, S Venkatesh, Shashi Kant, M Bhattacharya, et al. estimated number of PLHIV in India is 2.4 million (1.93–3.04 million) in 2009. Of which, 39% are women, children under 15 years of age account for 4.4% of all infections, while people aged 15–49 years account for 82.4% of all infected with HIV. (16) In our study, 70% were male patients and 30% were female indicating more number of HIV cases in male population, that is more than 50 % are males compared to females Women account for more than 1/2 the wide variety of humans dwelling with HIV worldwide. Young girls (10-24 years old) are twice as probably to acquire HIV as younger men the identical age17.
HIV disproportionately influences ladies and adolescent ladies because of vulnerabilities created by means of unequal cultural, social and financial status. Unaccommodating attitudes in the direction of sex outside of marriage and the restrained social autonomy of girls and young girls can minimize their potential to get entry to sexual fitness and HIV services. Much has been carried out to limit mother to child transmission of HIV, but a whole lot more needs to be executed to limit the gender inequality and violence that ladies and women at risk of HIV regularly face.
93.3% of HIV patients were heterosexual, 2 % were homosexual, 4.7% was mother to child transmission. Similar findings were noted in study done in coastal India, KMC Mangalore18 in 2015 which found 98.9% of HIV cases with heterosexual transmission.
A multitude of chance factors, such as the lack of male circumcision, concurrent and multiple partnerships, and migratory patterns, operates to create a “perfect storm”; no single issue in itself can explain such HIV levels, due to the fact all of them individually exist elsewhere. The practice of multiple sexual partnerships has been proven to be the most important threat aspect in the transmission of HIV. 19
53.3% of HIV+ve cases did not have any opportunistic infections i.e.. Approximately 47% had opportunistic infections.16.7% of HIV+ve cases had pulmonary Tuberculosis, followed by extra pulmonary tuberculosis being 9.3% and pulmonary TB with candidiasis being 4.3 %. Many combined infections were noted.
Similar findings were noted in a study done by Debasu Damtie et al20 in which it was discovered that the general OI incidence was (n= 71/360, 19.7 present). Tuberculosis has appeared as the most common infection associated with HIV infection in patients across the overall range of CD4 + followed by oral candidiasis among the observed spectrum of OIs. Infection with tuberculosis was discovered to be common among patients (n= 35/360, 9.72%).
Also very high significant association was found between CD4 count at diagnosis and opportunistic infections (p-value <0.001) and no association with recent CD4 count with opportunistic infections. It implied that CD4 count on diagnosis was considerably low which increased with cART very significantly. According to studies, patients with HIV not on cART will survive for a maximum of 2 years only. But the fact that our patients were on ART for 10 years or long itself signifies that cART increased number the life expectancy.
In our study Major age group affected are between age 31-40 years. In our study we found increased incidence of HIV infection in males, in rural areas and in low education statuses peoples. Most common mode of transmission was sexual (heterosexual mode). CD4 count improved after initiating patient on cART. Incidence of Opportunistic infections has decreased in those who were on cART.