Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
212 Views
21 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 11 Issue 5 (May, 2025) | Pages 711 - 717
Awareness of Biomedical Waste Management in Healthcare Personnel at Tertiary Care Hospital, Latur
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Microbiologist, Department of Microbiology, BC and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
March 22, 2025
Revised
April 15, 2025
Accepted
April 28, 2025
Published
May 30, 2025
Abstract

Background: "Bio-medical waste" is any waste generated during the diagnosis, treatment or immunization of human beings or animals or research activities pertaining thereto or in the production or testing of biological or in health camps. Majority of waste (75-90%) produced by the healthcare providers is non-risk or general and remaining (10-25%) of is regarded as hazardous for creating a variety of health problems (2). Among all health problems, there is a particular concern with HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B and C, for which there is a strong evidence of transmission through healthcare waste. The purpose of BMW management- mainly to reduce waste generation, to ensure its efficient collection, handling, & safe disposal in such a way that it controls infection and improves safety for employees working in the system. Aims & Objectives: 1. To assess the awareness in hospital personnel regarding bio-medical waste and its management. 2. To know the existing practices of biomedical waste management in the health facilities. Methodology: The study was conducted by using pretested, semistructured proforma. The study included details of various socio- demographic variables, like age, gender, working experience, type of work, etc and other details regarding awareness and practices for bio medical waste handling and its management. Total 282 health care personnel participated in the present study. Result: Though overall knowledge of study participants was good and satisfactory but still they need good regular training to improve their current knowledge about BMW. Conclusion: 1. The practices of appropriate waste disposal can be affected by lack of proper and complete knowledge about biomedical waste management. 2. Hence regular and frequent trainings of the healthcare workers and checking rounds is must.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

"Bio-medical waste" means any waste, which is generated during the diagnosis, treatment or immunization of human beings or animals or research activities pertaining thereto or in the production or testing of biological or in health camps.(1) Majority of waste (75-90%) produced by the healthcare providers is non-risk or general and remaining (10-25%) of healthcare waste is regarded as hazardous for creating a variety of health problems.(2) Bio medical waste collection and proper disposal has become a significant concern for both the medical and general community. Among all health problems, there is a particular concern with HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B and C, for which there is a strong evidence of transmission through healthcare waste. The BMW rule applies to all those who generate, collect, receive, store, transport, treat, dispose or handle BMW and also to every institution that generate BMW. The bio medical waste should be segregated at source into color coded bags or containers and its collection and proper disposal - a significant concern for both medical personnel and general community (3). Effective management of BMW - a legal necessity & a social responsibility. The purpose of BMW management- mainly to reduce waste generation, to ensure its efficient collection, handling, & safe disposal in such a way that it controls infection and improves safety for employees working in the system. For this, a conscious, coordinated and cooperative efforts has to be made from physicians to ward boys(4).

 

Aims and Objectives:

  • To assess the awareness in hospital personnel regarding bio-medical waste and its management.
  • To know the existing practices of biomedical waste management in the health facilities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
  • The study was conducted at tertiary care hospital Latur from may & June 2024.
  • It was a descriptive observational hospital based cross sectional study.
  • Study participants: resident doctors, nursing staff, laboratory technicians, ward boys and sweepers working in the institute.
  • The study was conducted by using pretested, semistructured proforma.
  • The study included details of various socio- demographic variables, like age, gender, working experience, type of work, etc and other details regarding awareness and practices for bio medical waste handling and its management.
  • All the health staff was invited individually to participate in the study after giving the informed consent. They were assured about their confidentiality and anonymity. Total 282 health care personnel participated in the present study.

 

RESULTS

TABLE 1

Awareness

Yes

No. (%)

No

No. (%)

Z

P value

Heard about Bio Medical Waste (BMW)

272 (96.45)

10 (3.55)

15.60

<0.001

Heard about BMW Rule/Act, 1998

213 (75.53)

69 (24.47)

8.57

<0.001

Received any training for BMW management (workshop)

208 (73.75)

74 (26.25)

7.98

<0.001

Know about Bio Hazard Symbol

237 (84.04)

45 (15.96)

11.43

<0.001

does present hospital generate BMW

273 (96.80)

9 (3.2)

15.72

<0.001

Know all BMW management categories

147 (52.12)

135

(47.88)

7.12

0.477

Know that the BMW can be stored maximum for 48 hrs

131 (46.45)

151

(53.55)

1.19

0.233

Any health hazard associated with BMW

274 (97.2)

8 (2.8)

15.92

<0.001

Is BMW transmits any disease

262 (92.90)

20 (7.1)

14.41

<0.001

Are different coloured bags used to dispose BMW

272 (96.45)

10 (3.55)

15.60

<0.001

Regular educational program/training needed for BMW

282 (100)

00

16.79

<0.001

Any guideline provided for colour coding at work area

263 (93.26)

19 (6.74)

14.53

<0.001

Identified all coloured bags used for BMW collection

186 (65.95)

96 (34.04)

5.36

<0.001

Awareness

Yes

No. (%)

No

No. (%)

Z

P value

Heard about Bio Medical Waste (BMW)

272 (96.45)

10 (3.55)

15.60

<0.001

Heard about BMW Rule/Act, 1998

213 (75.53)

69 (24.47)

8.57

<0.001

Received any training for BMW management (workshop)

208 (73.75)

74 (26.25)

7.98

<0.001

Know about Bio Hazard Symbol

237 (84.04)

45 (15.96)

11.43

<0.001

does present hospital generate BMW

273 (96.80)

9 (3.2)

15.72

<0.001

Know all BMW management categories

147 (52.12)

135

(47.88)

7.12

0.477

Know that the BMW can be stored maximum for 48 hrs

131 (46.45)

151

(53.55)

1.19

0.233

Any health hazard associated with BMW

274 (97.2)

8 (2.8)

15.92

<0.001

Is BMW transmits any disease

262 (92.90)

20 (7.1)

14.41

<0.001

Are different coloured bags used to dispose BMW

272 (96.45)

10 (3.55)

15.60

<0.001

Regular educational program/training needed for BMW

282 (100)

00

16.79

<0.001

Any guideline provided for colour coding at work area

263 (93.26)

19 (6.74)

14.53

<0.001

Identified all coloured bags used for BMW collection

186 (65.95)

96 (34.04)

5.36

<0.001

TABLE 2

Practices

Yes

No. (%)

No

No. (%)

Z

P value

Maintaining BMW records at work place

261 (92.55)

21 (7.45)

14.29

<0.001

Segregation of BMW done at work place

245 (86.87)

37 (13.13)

12.28

<0.001

Disinfection of BMW done before disposal at work place

238 (84.39)

44 (15.61)

11.55

<0.001

Using personal protective measures while handling BMW

249 (88.29)

33 (11.71)

12.86

<0.001

Spill management kit available

275 (97.51)

7 (2.49)

15.96

<0.001

Hand hygiene followed properly

242 (85.81)

40 (14.19)

12.03

<0.001

Proper storage facility provided for collecting BMW at work place

211 (74.82)

71 (25.18)

8.34

<0.001

Provided with puncture proof container for needles and syringes

196 (69.50)

86 30.50)

6.55

<0.001

Any record available for injuries related to BMW

149 (52.83)

133

(47.17)

0.95

0.342

Know the place where BMW treated

134 (47.51)

148

(52.49)

0.836

0.403

DISCUSSION

The present study was conducted among health care personnel of different level working at a tertiary care hospital. The study participants included resident doctors, nursing staff, laboratory technicians and sanitary staff. Total 282 health care personnel participated in the study. Majority participants heard about the BMW and its management rule and 73.75% of study participants have received training for BMW management. Yet only 52.12% study participants knows correct steps of BMW. This study was in agreement with the reference study of Rajesh Chudasama et al(5). Though overall knowledge of study participants was good and satisfactory but still they need good regular training to improve their current knowledge about BMW. These study findings are in agreement with the study of Yadavannavar (6), but in contrast to study conducted in Dhule and Nagpur (7,8). Emphasis should be given to good quality training of health care personnels working in the hospitals at regular time interval (9,10). Overall assessment about practices related to BMW management suggested that they need regular good quality training and regular checking rounds This is unsatisfactory that many health personnel did not know that there is a proper maintainance of record of sharp injuries and many people among those who sustained injury failed to register it. Similar findings were observed in other study also(9,11). Low reporting of injuries may be attributed to the fact that most of the doctors and other technical and nontechnical staff are unaware about a formal system of injury reporting which should be established within all the health facilities. For which a separate detailed knowledge workshop should be conducted for needle stick injury. To improve overall knowledge and practice related to BMW management and its handling following steps can be taken(9) like, strict implementation of bio medical waste management rules; it should be made compulsory for health care facilities to get their health care personnel trained at regular interval, this should not become merely a one time activity but should be a continuous process depending upon the patient input in different health care facilities; training of sanitary staff should be specially emphasized; it should be ensured that the injuries happening to the health care personnel are reported to the bio medical waste management committee.

CONCLUSION

Here on the observation, the knowledge and practices of BMW management are satisfactory. The practices of appropriate waste disposal can be affected by lack of proper and complete knowledge about biomedical waste management. Hence regular and frequent trainings of the healthcare workers and checking rounds is must.

REFERENCES
  1. Guidelines for Management of Healthcare Waste as per Biomedical Waste Management Rules, 2016. (Government of India)
  2. Safe management of waste from health care activities. WHO, Geneva; 1999.
  3. Central pollution control board. Environmental standard and guidelines for management of hospital waste. CPCB, Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi, 1996.
  4. Basu M, Das P, Pal R. Assessment of future physicians on biomedical waste management in a tertiary care hospital of West Bengal. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2012; 3: 38-42.
  5. Chudasama RK, Rangoonwala M, Sheth A, Misra SK, Kadri AM, Patel UV. Biomedical Waste Management: A study of knowledge, attitude and practice among health care personnel at tertiary care hospital in Rajkot. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science. 2013 Jul;1(1):17- 22.
  6. Yadavannavar MC, Berad AS, Jagirdar PB. Biomedical waste management: a study of knowledge, attitude and practices in a tertiary health care institution in Bijapur. Indian J Community Med 2010; 35: 170-171.
  7. Patil SP, Tambe MP, Patil PJ, Bhagwat VR. Awareness of healthcare workers regarding biomedical waste management (BMW) at tertiary care government hospital in dhule (Maharashtra). Natl J Integr Res Med. 2013 Jul 1;4(4):74-9.
  8. Rao H.V.N., Disposal of Hospital wastes in Banglore and their impact on Environment, Appropriate Waste Management Technologies for developing countries, 3rd International conference 25-26 Feb 1995, Nagpur, Technical paper Vol II.
  9. Mathur V, Dwivedi S, Hassan MA, Misra RP. Knowledge, attitude, and practices about biomedical waste management among health care personnel: a cross sectional study. Indian J Community Med 2011; 36: 143-145.
  10. Kishore J, Goel P, Sagar B, Joshi TK. Awareness about biomedical waste management and infection control among dentists of a teaching hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Dent Res 2000; 11: 157-61.
  11. Stein AD, Makarawo TP, Ahmad MF. A survey of doctors` and nurses` knowledge, attutitude and compliance with infection control guidelines in Birmingham teaching hospitals. J Hosp Infect 2003; 54: 68-73.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Evaluation of Changes in Intracuff Pressure Using Blockbuster Supraglottic Airway Device in Trendelenburg Position and Reverse Trendelenburg Position in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
...
Published: 19/08/2025
Research Article
Effectiveness of a School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Managing Academic Stress/Anxiety in Adolescents
Published: 18/08/2025
Research Article
Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
...
Published: 18/08/2025
Research Article
Reliability of Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap In Breast Reconstruction
...
Published: 18/08/2025
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice