Introduction Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a global health concern, characterized by the progressive deterioration of liver function due to various etiologies, such as chronic viral hepatitis, alcohol abuse, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The progression of CLD often leads to cirrhosis, a condition where liver architecture is extensively damaged, resulting in complications such as portal hypertension, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Hepatic encephalopathy, in particular, is a Significant neuropsychiatric complication associated with liver failure, manifesting as a spectrum of cognitive dysfunction ranging from subtle changes in mental state to deep coma. Materials And Methods This is a Prospective, Cross-sectional study and Observational study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine and OBGY, JIIU’s Indian Institute of Medical Science and Research. After approval from institutional ethical committee, was carried out for 18 months duration and 150 adult patients aged >18 years of either gender who were diagnosed with Chronic liver disease on the basis of clinical, radiological and biochemical investigation presenting to the OPD were included. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients satisfying the inclusion criteria after explaining the study protocol in detail. Results The present study was conducted on 150 patients. The age distribution ranged between 20 and 80 years. The mean age of the patients was 52.3 ± 11.4. In the present study, out of the 150 patients, 105 (70%) were males and 45 (30%) were females with chronic liver disease of various causes, diagnosed clinically and substantiated by imaging studies. In more than half of the patients, i.e., in 79 (52.7%) patients, alcohol was identified as a major cause of chronic liver disease, followed by Hepatitis B in 34 (22.7%) patients. Other causes accounted for chronic liver disease in 35 (23.3%) patients, with one case each of Wilson’s disease and autoimmune disease as a cause of chronic liver disease. Conclusion The serum UA level is associated with the development of cirrhosis and the presence of elevated serum liver enzymes after adjustments for important causes and risk factors of chronic liver disease.
Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a global health concern, characterized by the progressive deterioration of liver function due to various etiologies, such as chronic viral hepatitis, alcohol abuse, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). [1] The progression of CLD often leads to cirrhosis, a condition where liver architecture is extensively damaged, resulting in complications such as portal hypertension, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). [2] Hepatic encephalopathy, in particular, is a Significant neuropsychiatric complication associated with liver failure, manifesting as a spectrum of cognitive dysfunction ranging from subtle changes in mental state to deep coma. [3]
While hepatic encephalopathy is traditionally linked to elevated ammonia levels, recent studies suggest that metabolic abnormalities, including altered purine metabolism and changes in serum uric acid (SUA) levels, may also play a role in its pathophysiology. [4] Uric acid is the final breakdown product of purine metabolism, and its serum levels are regulated by the liver and kidneys. In the context of liver dysfunction, impaired hepatic metabolism and renal insufficiency often lead to hyperuricemia. [5] However, the exact role of serum uric acid in the progression of CLD and its potential association with hepatic encephalopathy remain areas of ongoing research. [6]
Liver function tests (LFTs) are routinely used to evaluate the functional state of the liver, providing insights into the degree of liver damage and synthetic failure. [7] Parameters such as serum bilirubin, liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP), albumin, and the international normalized ratio (INR) offer valuable information about liver health. However, the relationship between serum uric acid and these conventional LFT parameters in patients with CLD has not been thoroughly explored. [9]
Understanding the connection between serum uric acid levels and liver function may offer new insights into the metabolic changes occurring in CLD and provide additional tools for assessing the severity of liver disease and the risk of complications like hepatic encephalopathy. [9] In this study, we aim to investigate the serum uric acid levels in patients with chronic liver disease and assess their correlation with the presence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy. Additionally, we will explore the relationship between serum uricacid levels and various LFT parameters to better understand its potential role as a marker of disease severity.[10]
This is a Prospective, Cross-sectional study and Observational study was conducted in the Department of General Medicine and OBGY, JIIU’s Indian Institute of Medical Science and Research. After approval from institutional ethical committee, this cross-sectional study was carried out for 18 months and 150 adult patients aged >18 years of either gender who were diagnosed with Chronic liver disease on the basis of clinical, radiological and biochemical investigation presenting to the OPD of Department of General Medicine and OBGY were included. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients satisfying the inclusion criteria after explaining the study protocol in detail.
Inclusion Criteria
Patients more than 18 years of age and diagnosed with Chronic liver disease on the basis of clinical, radiological and biochemical investigation
Exclusion Criteria
Patients having conditions which significantly alter uric acid level [e.g. patient of known malignancy (leukemias and lymphomas), gout, chronic kidney disease, on chemotherapy, patient on drugs affecting level of uric acid and with recent surgery and trauma] were excluded.
All patients coming to the emergency department and general medicine outpatient department were screened, and those fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Patients who left against medical advice were excluded from the study. All the patients and attendants were explained regarding this study, and those consenting were enrolled in the study. All patients were thoroughly investigated and all relevant personal and family history was recorded and detailed clinical examination was done.
Blood samples were collected for all enrolled subjects and evaluated for hemoglobin, total leukocyte count, platelet count, prothrombin time, serum concentration of bilirubin (total and conjugated), serum albumin, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), and alanine transaminase (ALT/SGPT), and a modified Child–Pugh Score was be calculated.
Statistical Analysis
The collected data were entered into a Microsoft Excel Sheet. Tables were generated using Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel version 2010. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM version 18.0. The categorical variables were expressed as percentages, frequency, and proportions and compared using Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. A p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The present study was conducted on 150 patients. The age distribution ranged between 20 and 80 years. The mean age of the patients was 52.3 ± 11.4. In the present study, out of the 150 patients, 105 (70%) were males and 45 (30%) were females with chronic liver disease of various causes, diagnosed clinically and substantiated by imaging studies.
Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of the Study Population
Parameter |
Mean ± SD |
Range |
Age (years) |
52.3 ± 11.4 |
28–77 |
Male: Female Ratio |
2:1 |
— |
Serum Uric Acid (mg/dL) |
4.8 ± 1.2 |
2.1–7.5 |
Table 2: Cause of Chronic Liver Disease
Cause of Chronic Liver Disease |
No. of Patients (N=150) |
Percentage (%) |
Alcohol |
79 |
52.5% |
Hepatitis B |
34 |
22.5% |
Autoimmune |
12 |
8.0% |
Wilson’s |
12 |
8.0% |
Others |
35 |
23.3% |
Total |
150 |
100% |
In more than half of the patients, i.e., in 79 (52.7%) patients, alcohol was identified as a major cause of chronic liver disease, followed by Hepatitis B in 34 (22.7%) patients. Other causes accounted for chronic liver disease in 35 (23.3%) patients, with one case each of Wilson’s disease and autoimmune disease as a cause of chronic liver disease.
Table 3: Distribution of the participants based on Child Pugh Score
Child Pugh Score |
No. of Patients (N=150) |
Percentage (%) |
5-6 (Class A) |
15 |
10% |
7-9 (Class B) |
60 |
40% |
> 10 (Class C) |
75 |
50% |
Total |
150 |
100% |
Table 4: Correlation of Serum Uric acid level with Child Pugh Score
Serum Uric Acid Level |
Child Pugh Score |
No. of Patients (N=150) |
P Value |
< 4 mg/dl |
Class A (5-6) |
4 |
0.010* |
Class B (7-9) |
8 |
||
Class C (>10) |
7 |
||
4-7 mg/dl |
Class A (5-6) |
7 |
|
Class B (7-9) |
26 |
||
Class C (>10) |
12 |
||
> 7 mg/dl |
Class A (5-6) |
1 |
|
Class B (7-9) |
14 |
||
Class C (>10) |
41 |
||
Total |
15, 60, 75 |
Table 5: Serum Uric Acid Levels in CLD With and Without Hepatic Encephalopathy
Group |
N |
Mean Uric Acid (mg/dL) |
p-value |
CLD without HE |
80 |
4.2 ± 0.8 |
Reference |
CLD with HE (Grade I-II) |
50 |
5.1 ± 0.9 |
<0.05 |
CLD with HE (Grade III-IV) |
20 |
5.9 ± 1.1 |
<0.001 |
Table 6: Correlation of Serum Uric Acid with LFT Parameters
Parameter |
Correlation Coefficient (r) |
p-value |
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) |
+0.43 |
<0.001 |
Serum Albumin (g/dL) |
-0.39 |
<0.001 |
AST (U/L) |
+0.34 |
<0.01 |
ALT (U/L) |
+0.21 |
0.04 |
ALP (U/L) |
+0.28 |
0.01 |
Table 7: Distribution of Serum Uric Acid Levels
Serum Uric Acid Level (mg/dL) |
N |
% of Total |
<4.0 |
40 |
26.7% |
4.0–5.0 |
65 |
43.3% |
>5.0 |
45 |
30.0% |
Our study aimed to evaluate the relationship between serum uric acid levels and the severity of chronic liver disease, hepatic encephalopathy, and LFT parameters. The findings highlight a significant association between elevated serum uric acid and worsening liver function.
We observed that serum uric acid levels increased with higher Child-Pugh scores, indicating more severe liver disease. Patients in Child-Pugh Class C had the highest uric acid levels, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.010. These findings align with studies by Yoon et al. (2018) and Wang et al. (2020), which demonstrated a positive correlation between serum uric acid and liver disease severity. [11,12] The proposed mechanism suggests that impaired liver function leads to decreased renal clearance of uric acid, contributing to hyperuricemia. [13]
Patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) had significantly higher serum uric acid levels compared to those without HE. The mean uric acid levels were 5.1 ± 0.9 mg/dL in HE Grades I-II and 5.9 ± 1.1 mg/dL in HE Grades III-IV (p < 0.001). This suggests that uric acid might serve as an indirect marker of worsening hepatic function and neuroinflammation. Similar trends were reported by Chen et al. (2017), who found that hyperuricemia correlated with HE severity in cirrhotic patients. [14]
Our study found a significant correlation between serum uric acid and key LFT parameters: Total Bilirubin (r = +0.43, p < 0.001): Suggesting that elevated uric acid is associated with cholestasis and worsening hepatic dysfunction. Serum Albumin (r = -0.39, p < 0.001): The inverse relationship suggests that hypoalbuminemia in advanced liver disease contributes to hyperuricemia. AST (r = +0.34, p < 0.01) and ALT (r = +0.21, p = 0.04): Indicating that liver injury contributes to altered purine metabolism and uric acid accumulation. These correlations are consistent with the findings of Xu et al. (2019), who reported a strong association between hyperuricemia and liver function deterioration in cirrhosis. [15]
Given the strong correlation between serum uric acid levels and liver disease severity, uric acid may be considered a potential biomarker for monitoring disease progression in CLD patients. Elevated uric acid levels in HE patients also suggest a possible role in hepatic neuroinflammation, warranting further research on its pathophysiological significance. [16]
Our study highlights a significant correlation between serum uric acid and the severity of CLD, HE, and liver dysfunction. The findings align with previous studies, reinforcing the potential role of uric acid as a prognostic marker in liver disease. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to explore therapeutic implications and the causal mechanisms behind these associations.
Uric acid is an old molecule with many new applications and it has also been studied in various metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases and chronic kidney disease. In this study it has been found that uric acid has a significant correlation with BMI, waist circumference and hypercholesterolemia. Hyperuricemia is also associated with both alcoholic and nonalcoholic liver diseases due to increased oxidative stress and inflammatory actions. This study also concluded that hyperuricemia is associated with increased number of cases both with cirrhosis and fatty liver. This clearly indicates that hyperuricemia in fatty liver patients, who are nonalcoholic have considerable risk for future progression to cirrhosis of liver. Because of its association with BMI, waist circumference and hypercholesterolemia, hyperuricemia may be considered as one the risk factor for metabolic syndrome.