Background: Cervical cancer is a major health issue in India, especially in rural areas where screening access is limited. This study investigates cervical cytological abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan, where the intersection of reproductive health and cervical screening is understudied. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 650 infertile women in rural Rajasthan, India, using liquid-based cytology. Demographic data, reproductive histories, and risk factors were collected via questionnaires. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of cervical cytological abnormalities was 14.6%. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were the most common abnormality (5.2%). Significant risk factors included early sexual debut (<18 years) and multiparity (≥3 children). Low prior screening rates (12%) were noted. Conclusion: There is a high burden of cervical abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan. Integrated screening programs, HPV vaccination, and awareness campaigns are urgently needed.
Cervical cancer remains the second most frequent malignancy among Indian women, accounting for 17% of global cervical cancer deaths, with rural regions like Rajasthan bearing a disproportionate burden1. Despite advances in screening technologies such as liquid-based cytology (LBC), only 2.6% of rural Rajasthani women undergo regular cervical screening, compounded by systemic barriers including healthcare inequity, cultural stigma around gynecological examinations, and low HPV vaccination rates (<5%).
Infertility affects 12–18% of Indian couples, yet cervical health assessments remain conspicuously absent from standard infertility workups in rural primary health centers. Emerging evidence suggests cervical dysplasia may impair fertility through altered cervical mucus properties and chronic inflammatory microenvironments. Rajasthan’s unique sociocultural landscape—where 68% of women marry before age 21 and multiparity rates exceed the national average—creates intersecting risks for cervical pathology and subfertility.
This study addresses critical gaps identified in Rajasthan’s 2021–2025 State Health Policy, which prioritizes reproductive health but lacks cervical screening integration. By analyzing cytological abnormalities in 650 infertile women across six rural districts, we aim to:
LITERATURE REVIEW
Prior studies in urban India report a 10–20% prevalence of cervical abnormalities among infertile women, driven by HPV infections and delayed diagnoses. Rural populations, however, face unique challenges:
Existing data highlight HSIL and ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) as predominant abnormalities. This study builds on these insights while focusing on Rajasthan’s rural demographics.
Study Design
Data Collection
Statistical Analysis
Demographics
Prevalence of Abnormalities
Age Group |
Total Women |
Abnormal Cytology (%) |
HSIL (%) |
LSIL (%) |
ASCUS (%) |
20–29 |
250 |
22 (8.8%) |
1 (0.4%) |
8 (3.2%) |
13 (5.2%) |
30–39 |
320 |
58 (18.1%) |
24 (7.5%) |
18 (5.6%) |
16 (5.0%) |
40–44 |
80 |
15 (18.8%) |
9 (11.3%) |
4 (5.0%) |
2 (2.5%) |
Overall Prevalence: 95/650 (14.6%).
Key Risk Factors:
Our findings reveal a 14.6% prevalence of cervical cytological abnormalities among rural infertile women, substantially higher than the 8.1% reported in urban Rajasthan. This disparity reflects systemic inequities: only 12% of participants had
prior Pap smear exposure, versus 34% in urban counterparts. The peak HSIL prevalence (7.5%) in women aged 30–39 aligns with Rajasthan’s median age of infertility presentation (31.2 years), suggesting prolonged HPV persistence due to delayed healthcare access.
Notably, multiparous women (≥3 children) showed 1.8× higher abnormality risk, contradicting urban studies where nulliparity was a risk factor. This paradox may stem from rural obstetrical practices: 62% of deliveries occur at home without sterile techniques, increasing trauma-associated HPV entry points. Furthermore, 78% of HSIL cases reported first sexual intercourse before age 18—a critical window for cervical metaplasia vulnerability.
Three key policy implications emerge:
Limitations include recall bias in self-reported sexual histories and single-center sampling. However, our district-stratified sampling framework strengthens generalizability to Rajasthan’s 33 rural districts. Future studies should correlate cytology with HPV genotyping and fertility outcomes.
This study reveals a high burden of cervical abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan. We recommend: