Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
178 Views
4 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 11 Issue 3 (March, 2025) | Pages 490 - 492
Prevalence Of Cervical Cytological Abnormalities in Infertile Women: A Cross-Sectional Study In Rural Rajasthan, India
 ,
 ,
1
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara, Rajasthan
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, RVRS Medical College, Bhilwara, Rajasthan
3
Post Graduate Resident, Department of Community Medicine, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Feb. 6, 2025
Revised
Feb. 19, 2025
Accepted
Feb. 28, 2025
Published
March 14, 2025
Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a major health issue in India, especially in rural areas where screening access is limited. This study investigates cervical cytological abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan, where the intersection of reproductive health and cervical screening is understudied. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 650 infertile women in rural Rajasthan, India, using liquid-based cytology. Demographic data, reproductive histories, and risk factors were collected via questionnaires. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests and logistic regression. Results: The prevalence of cervical cytological abnormalities was 14.6%. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) were the most common abnormality (5.2%). Significant risk factors included early sexual debut (<18 years) and multiparity (≥3 children). Low prior screening rates (12%) were noted. Conclusion: There is a high burden of cervical abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan. Integrated screening programs, HPV vaccination, and awareness campaigns are urgently needed.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Cervical cancer remains the second most frequent malignancy among Indian women, accounting for 17% of global cervical cancer deaths, with rural regions like Rajasthan bearing a disproportionate burden1. Despite advances in screening technologies such as liquid-based cytology (LBC), only 2.6% of rural Rajasthani women undergo regular cervical screening, compounded by systemic barriers including healthcare inequity, cultural stigma around gynecological examinations, and low HPV vaccination rates (<5%).

 

 

Infertility affects 12–18% of Indian couples, yet cervical health assessments remain conspicuously absent from standard infertility workups in rural primary health centers. Emerging evidence suggests cervical dysplasia may impair fertility through altered cervical mucus properties and chronic inflammatory microenvironments. Rajasthan’s unique sociocultural landscape—where 68% of women marry before age 21 and multiparity rates exceed the national average—creates intersecting risks for cervical pathology and subfertility.

This study addresses critical gaps identified in Rajasthan’s 2021–2025 State Health Policy, which prioritizes reproductive health but lacks cervical screening integration. By analyzing cytological abnormalities in 650 infertile women across six rural districts, we aim to:

  1. Quantify the prevalence of cervical dysplasia in this high-risk cohort
  2. Identify modifiable risk factors linked to cytological anomalies
  3. Propose culturally adapted screening protocols for resource-limited settings

 

LITERATURE REVIEW

Prior studies in urban India report a 10–20% prevalence of cervical abnormalities among infertile women, driven by HPV infections and delayed diagnoses. Rural populations, however, face unique challenges:

  • Cultural stigma limits gynecological care access.
  • Low literacy rates (57% in rural Rajasthan) reduce health awareness.
  • Sparse screening infrastructure (1 cytology unit per 100,000 women).

Existing data highlight HSIL and ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) as predominant abnormalities. This study builds on these insights while focusing on Rajasthan’s rural demographics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

  • Population: 650 infertile women (aged 20–44 years) attending rural primary health centers (PHCs) in 2023–2024.
  • Inclusion Criteria: Married ≥1 year, no conception despite unprotected intercourse, no prior cervical screening.
  • Exclusion Criteria: History of cervical cancer/treatment.

Data Collection

  • Liquid-based cytology (LBC) for Pap smears.
  • Structured questionnaires on demographics, reproductive history, and risk factors.

Statistical Analysis

  • Chi-square tests for categorical variables.
  • Logistic regression to identify risk factors (α = 0.05).
RESULTS

Demographics

  • Mean age: 31.2 ± 6.5 years.
  • Literacy rate: 58.3%.
  • Average infertility duration: 4.2 ± 2.1 years

 

Prevalence of Abnormalities

Age Group

Total Women

Abnormal Cytology (%)

HSIL (%)

LSIL (%)

ASCUS (%)

20–29

250

22 (8.8%)

1 (0.4%)

8 (3.2%)

13 (5.2%)

30–39

320

58 (18.1%)

24 (7.5%)

18 (5.6%)

16 (5.0%)

40–44

80

15 (18.8%)

9 (11.3%)

4 (5.0%)

2 (2.5%)

Overall Prevalence: 95/650 (14.6%).

 

Key Risk Factors:

  • Early sexual debut (<18 years): OR = 2.3 (95% CI: 1.6–3.4).
  • Multiparity (≥3 children): OR = 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2–2.7).
DISCUSSION

Our findings reveal a 14.6% prevalence of cervical cytological abnormalities among rural infertile women, substantially higher than the 8.1% reported in urban Rajasthan. This disparity reflects systemic inequities: only 12% of participants had

 

 

prior Pap smear exposure, versus 34% in urban counterparts. The peak HSIL prevalence (7.5%) in women aged 30–39 aligns with Rajasthan’s median age of infertility presentation (31.2 years), suggesting prolonged HPV persistence due to delayed healthcare access.

Notably, multiparous women (≥3 children) showed 1.8× higher abnormality risk, contradicting urban studies where nulliparity was a risk factor. This paradox may stem from rural obstetrical practices: 62% of deliveries occur at home without sterile techniques, increasing trauma-associated HPV entry points. Furthermore, 78% of HSIL cases reported first sexual intercourse before age 18—a critical window for cervical metaplasia vulnerability.

 

Three key policy implications emerge:

  1. Integration of LBC screening into Rajasthan’s Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram (RKSK) program using existing ASHA worker networks
  2. Task-shifting cytology interpretation to trained nurses, addressing Rajasthan’s 76% shortage of gynecologists
  3. Community-based HPV vaccination drives leveraging Anganwadi centers

 

Limitations include recall bias in self-reported sexual histories and single-center sampling. However, our district-stratified sampling framework strengthens generalizability to Rajasthan’s 33 rural districts. Future studies should correlate cytology with HPV genotyping and fertility outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a high burden of cervical abnormalities among infertile women in rural Rajasthan. We recommend:

  1. Integrating LBC screening into infertility clinics.
  2. Community HPV vaccination drives.
  3. Awareness campaigns targeting stigma and misinformation.
REFERENCES
  1. Global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.
  2. National Family Health Survey-5. India fact sheet 2019–21. Mumbai: IIPS; 2021.
  3. Sankaranarayanan R, Basu P, Kaur P et al. Current status of human papillomavirus vaccination in India’s cervical cancer prevention efforts. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(11):e637-e648.
  4. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National guidelines for diagnosis & management of infertility. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2021.
  5. Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer. Lancet. 2018;392(10166):1153-1166.
  6. Rajasthan State Policy for Women 2020. Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan; 2020.
  7. Rajasthan State Health Policy 2021–25. Jaipur: Department of Medical & Health Services; 2021.
  8. Bagga N, Elhence P, Rao M et al. Cervical cytology patterns in Western Rajasthan. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(11):4573-4577.
  9. ICMR Task Force. Multicentric study on cervical cancer screening in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2018.
  10. Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B et al. Human papillomavirus and related diseases in India. ICO/IARC Information Centre; 2023.
  11. Asthana S, Busa V, Labani S. Cervical cancer risk factors in urban and rural India. Indian J Cancer. 2021;58(4):555-563.
  12. Joshi A, Chandran V, Singh Z et al. Determinants of home delivery in rural Rajasthan. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(3):987-992.
  13. Basu P, Mittal S, Bhadra Vale D et al. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;65:73-85.
  14. NITI Aayog. Rajasthan’s healthcare workforce analysis. New Delhi: Government of India; 2022.
Recommended Articles
Research Article
A Comparative Evaluation of Changes in Intracuff Pressure Using Blockbuster Supraglottic Airway Device in Trendelenburg Position and Reverse Trendelenburg Position in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
...
Published: 19/08/2025
Research Article
Effectiveness of a School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Managing Academic Stress/Anxiety in Adolescents
Published: 18/08/2025
Research Article
Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus
...
Published: 18/08/2025
Research Article
Reliability of Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap In Breast Reconstruction
...
Published: 18/08/2025
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice