Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
45 Views
2 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 11 Issue 3 (March, 2025) | Pages 828 - 832
Study of CRP in the prognostic evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina / MI)
 ,
 ,
1
Senior Resident, Department of General Medicine, AIIMS Patna, Bihar, India
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Jan. 23, 2025
Revised
Feb. 9, 2025
Accepted
March 6, 2025
Published
March 27, 2025
Abstract

Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), encompassing unstable angina and myocardial infarction (MI), remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory marker, has gained attention for its role in predicting cardiovascular events. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of CRP levels in patients with ACS and their correlation with clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods A total of 100 patients diagnosed with ACS were included in this prospective study. Patients were classified into two groups: unstable angina (n=50) and MI (n=50). Serum CRP levels were measured at the time of admission and categorized into low (<3 mg/L), moderate (3–10 mg/L), and high (>10 mg/L) levels. The association of CRP with in-hospital complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality was assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Patients with higher CRP levels (>10 mg/L) showed a significantly increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (p=0.002). The mean CRP level in MI patients was 12.5±4.3 mg/L, significantly higher than in unstable angina patients (6.8±2.7 mg/L, p<0.01). Prolonged hospital stay (>7 days) was observed in 65% of patients with high CRP levels compared to 30% in those with moderate CRP levels. Mortality rates were 12% in the high CRP group, while no deaths were recorded in the low CRP group. Conclusion Elevated CRP levels in ACS patients are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including higher rates of MACE, prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality. CRP can serve as a valuable biomarker for risk stratification and prognostic evaluation in ACS patients. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a significant global health burden, contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates among cardiovascular diseases (1). It encompasses a spectrum of conditions, including unstable angina (UA) and myocardial infarction (MI), which result from atherosclerotic plaque rupture and subsequent thrombosis leading to myocardial ischemia (2,3). Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, risk stratification remains a crucial component of ACS management to improve patient outcomes.

 

Inflammation plays a central role in the pathophysiology of ACS, and biomarkers reflecting inflammatory activity have gained attention in risk assessment (4). Among them, C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant produced by the liver in response to systemic inflammation, has been widely studied for its prognostic significance in cardiovascular diseases (5,6). Elevated CRP levels have been associated with endothelial dysfunction, plaque instability, and increased thrombotic potential, contributing to adverse cardiovascular events (7,8).

 

Several studies have demonstrated a direct correlation between high CRP levels and worse clinical outcomes in ACS patients, including increased rates of myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemic events, heart failure, and mortality (9,10). The American Heart Association (AHA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have recognized CRP as a potential marker for cardiovascular risk stratification (11). However, its routine application in ACS prognosis remains debated, necessitating further clinical evaluation.

 

This study aims to assess the prognostic value of CRP levels in patients presenting with ACS, comparing their correlation with in-hospital complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality. By evaluating CRP as a potential predictor of adverse outcomes, this study seeks to contribute to more effective risk stratification and management strategies for ACS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Study Design and Setting

This prospective observational study was conducted in the Cardiology Department of a tertiary care hospital over a period of six months. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was collected from all participants before enrollment.

 

Study Population

A total of 100 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were included in the study. The patients were categorized into two groups: unstable angina (UA) (n=50) and myocardial infarction (MI) (n=50), based on clinical presentation, electrocardiographic (ECG) findings, and cardiac biomarker levels. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, infections, malignancies, or prior cardiovascular events within six months were excluded.

 

Data Collection and CRP Measurement

Blood samples were collected from each patient at the time of hospital admission. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured using a high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) assay through an immunoturbidimetric method. Based on CRP levels, patients were categorized into three groups:

 

  • Low CRP: <3 mg/L
  • Moderate CRP: 3–10 mg/L
  • High CRP: >10 mg/L

 

Clinical and Outcome Assessment

All patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation, including ECG, echocardiography, and cardiac enzyme analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were:

  • Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including recurrent ischemia, heart failure, arrhythmias, and mortality
  • Length of hospital stay (≤7 days or >7 days)
  • Need for invasive interventions, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)

 

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 25.0). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using the Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and analyzed using the Chi-square test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant..

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics

The study included 100 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), comprising 50 cases of unstable angina (UA) and 50 cases of myocardial infarction (MI). The mean age of the participants was 58.4 ± 10.2 years, with 65% being male and 35% female. Hypertension and diabetes were the most prevalent comorbidities, observed in 60% and 45% of patients, respectively. Smoking history was noted in 40% of the study population. The baseline characteristics of the study groups are summarized in Table 1.

 

Serum CRP Levels and ACS Subtypes

The mean CRP level was significantly higher in MI patients (12.5 ± 4.3 mg/L) compared to those with UA (6.8 ± 2.7 mg/L, p<0.01). Among MI patients, 70% had CRP levels >10 mg/L, while only 30% of UA patients exhibited such levels (Table 2).

 

Association of CRP with Clinical Outcomes

A significant correlation was observed between elevated CRP levels and adverse clinical outcomes. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was highest in the high CRP group (>10 mg/L), with 65% experiencing complications such as recurrent ischemia, heart failure, or arrhythmias, compared to 25% in the moderate CRP group and 10% in the low CRP group (Table 3).

 

Length of Hospital Stay

Patients with higher CRP levels had a longer duration of hospitalization. Among those with CRP levels >10 mg/L, 65% had hospital stays exceeding 7 days, whereas only 30% of the moderate CRP group and 10% of the low CRP group required extended hospitalization (Table 4).

 

Mortality Rates

The overall mortality rate was 8%, with all deaths occurring in the high CRP group. No mortality was recorded in patients with CRP levels below 10 mg/L (Table 5).

 

Tables

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Study Population

Characteristic

Total (n=100)

Unstable Angina (n=50)

Myocardial Infarction (n=50)

p-value

Age (years)

58.4 ± 10.2

57.2 ± 9.8

59.6 ± 10.5

0.32

Male (%)

65

60

70

0.28

Hypertension (%)

60

55

65

0.40

Diabetes (%)

45

40

50

0.35

Smoking (%)

40

35

45

0.38

 

Table 2: CRP Levels in ACS Patients

CRP Level (mg/L)

Total (n=100)

Unstable Angina (n=50)

Myocardial Infarction (n=50)

<3 (Low)

20 (20%)

15 (30%)

5 (10%)

3–10 (Moderate)

35 (35%)

20 (40%)

15 (30%)

>10 (High)

45 (45%)

15 (30%)

30 (60%)

 

Table 3: Association of CRP with MACE

CRP Level (mg/L)

MACE Incidence (%)

<3 (Low)

10%

3–10 (Moderate)

25%

>10 (High)

65%

 

Table 4: Length of Hospital Stay Based on CRP Levels

CRP Level (mg/L)

Hospital Stay ≤7 days (%)

Hospital Stay >7 days (%)

<3 (Low)

90

10

3–10 (Moderate)

70

30

>10 (High)

35

65

 

Table 5: CRP Levels and Mortality Rates

CRP Level (mg/L)

Mortality (%)

<3 (Low)

0

3–10 (Moderate)

0

>10 (High)

8

These findings suggest that elevated CRP levels are strongly associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes, prolonged hospital stay, and higher mortality rates in ACS patients

 

DISCUSSION

C-reactive protein (CRP) has been increasingly recognized as an important biomarker in assessing the prognosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. In this study, we observed a significant correlation between elevated CRP levels and adverse clinical outcomes, including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), prolonged hospitalization, and increased mortality. These findings support previous research indicating the role of systemic inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of ACS (1,2).

Inflammation plays a central role in atherosclerosis, plaque instability, and subsequent thrombotic events (3). CRP, an acute-phase reactant produced by the liver in response to interleukin-6 (IL-6) stimulation, has been linked to endothelial dysfunction, increased platelet activation, and enhanced prothrombotic activity (4,5). The significantly higher CRP levels observed in myocardial infarction (MI) patients compared to those with unstable angina (UA) in our study align with previous findings demonstrating that CRP levels rise proportionally with the severity of myocardial damage (6).

Several studies have highlighted the predictive value of CRP in determining the likelihood of MACE in ACS patients (7,8). Our study found that 65% of patients with CRP levels >10 mg/L experienced MACE, while only 10% of those with CRP levels <3 mg/L had such complications. This supports the hypothesis that CRP is not merely a marker of inflammation but an active participant in vascular injury, contributing to plaque rupture and progression of coronary events (9).

Prolonged hospital stays were significantly associated with higher CRP levels in our study. Among patients with CRP >10 mg/L, 65% had hospitalization periods exceeding seven days, whereas only 10% of the low CRP group required extended care. Similar trends have been reported in previous studies, where elevated CRP levels were linked to increased rates of recurrent ischemic episodes, heart failure, and need for revascularization (10,11). Elevated CRP may indicate a persistent inflammatory response, leading to delayed recovery and a higher risk of secondary complications (12).

Mortality risk was notably higher in patients with elevated CRP. In our study, all recorded deaths occurred in the high CRP group, with a mortality rate of 8%. Previous research has demonstrated a direct association between increased CRP levels and higher short-term and long-term mortality in ACS patients (13). Elevated CRP has been found to independently predict mortality even after adjusting for traditional risk factors, such as age, diabetes, and left ventricular dysfunction (14).

Despite the strong association between CRP levels and adverse outcomes, routine CRP measurement in ACS patients remains a topic of debate. While some guidelines suggest its use as an adjunct to traditional risk assessment tools, others emphasize the need for further large-scale clinical trials to validate its prognostic utility (15). Future studies should focus on integrating CRP into multi-biomarker models for enhanced risk stratification and personalized treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Elevated CRP levels were strongly associated with increased incidence of major adverse cardiac events, prolonged hospital stay, and higher mortality rates. These findings reinforce the role of inflammation in the progression of ACS and suggest that CRP can serve as a useful biomarker for risk stratification. Integrating CRP assessment into routine clinical practice may improve early identification of high-risk patients and aid in optimizing treatment strategies. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these results and explore potential therapeutic interventions targeting inflammation in ACS.

REFERENCES
  1. Hatmi ZN, Saeid AK, Broumand MA, Khoshkar SN, Danesh ZF. Multiple inflammatory prognostic factors in acute coronary syndromes: a prospective inception cohort study. Acta Med Iran.2010 Jan-Feb;48(1):51-7. PMID: 21137670.
  2. Munir TA, Afzal MN, Habib-ur-Rehman. Baseline leukocyte count and acute coronary syndrome: predictor of adverse cardiac events, long and short-term mortality and association with traditional risk factors, cardiac biomarkers and C-reactive protein. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad.2009 Jul-Sep;21(3):46-50. PMID: 20929011.
  3. Roman RM, Camargo PV, Borges FK, Rossini AP, Polanczyk CA. Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in coronary artery disease: comparison of unstable and stable angina patients. Coron Artery Dis.2010 May;21(3):129-36. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f50d. PMID: 20305551.
  4. Plak M, Orliński L, Łobos M, Ciesielczyk M, Wlazeł RN, Paradowski MT. [Evaluation of dynamic cardiac troponin I concentrations and C-reactive protein in the monitoring of myocardial infarction in patients with repeated myocardial infarction]. Pol Merkur Lekarski.2010 Jun;28(168):444-9. PMID: 20642101.
  5. Narain VS, Gupta N, Sethi R, Puri A, Dwivedi SK, Saran RK, Puri VK. Clinical correlation of multiple biomarkers for risk assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Indian Heart J.2008 Nov-Dec;60(6):536-42. PMID: 19276492.
  6. Tello-Montoliu A, Marín F, Roldán V, Mainar L, López MT, Sogorb F, Vicente V, Lip GY. A multimarker risk stratification approach to non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: implications of troponin T, CRP, NT pro-BNP and fibrin D-dimer levels. J Intern Med.2007 Dec;262(6):651-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01871.x. PMID: 17986200.
  7. Postadzhiyan AS, Tzontcheva AV, Kehayov I, Finkov B. Circulating soluble adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and their association with clinical outcome, troponin T and C-reactive protein in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clin Biochem.2008 Feb;41(3):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.09.001. PMID: 18061588.
  8. Viswanathan K, Kilcullen N, Morrell C, Thistlethwaite SJ, Sivananthan MU, Hassan TB, Barth JH, Hall AS. Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein predicts long-term mortality and re-infarction in consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who are troponin-negative. J Am Coll Cardiol.2010 Jun 8;55(23):2590-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.062. PMID: 20513600.
  9. Di Stefano R, Di Bello V, Barsotti MC, Grigoratos C, Armani C, Dell'Omodarme M, Carpi A, Balbarini A. Inflammatory markers and cardiac function in acute coronary syndrome: difference in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and in non-STEMI models. Biomed Pharmacother.2009 Dec;63(10):773-80. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2009.06.004. PMID: 19906505.
  10. Fang L, Wei H, Mak KH, Xiong Z, Song J, Wang D, Lim YL, Chatterjee S. Markers of low-grade inflammation and soluble cell adhesion molecules in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease. Can J Cardiol.2004 Dec;20(14):1433-8. PMID: 15614337.
  11. Dokainish H, Pillai M, Murphy SA, DiBattiste PM, Schweiger MJ, Lotfi A, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Braunwald E, Lakkis N; TACTICS-TIMI-18 Investigators. Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol.2005 Jan 4;45(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.09.056. PMID: 15629367.
  12. Eggers KM, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, Wallentin L, Lindahl B. Prognostic value of biomarkers during and after non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol.2009 Jul 21;54(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.056. PMID: 19608034.
  13. Bogaty P, Boyer L, Simard S, Dauwe F, Dupuis R, Verret B, Huynh T, Bertrand F, Dagenais GR, Brophy JM. Clinical utility of C-reactive protein measured at admission, hospital discharge, and 1 month later to predict outcome in patients with acute coronary disease. The RISCA (recurrence and inflammation in the acute coronary syndromes) study. J Am Coll Cardiol.2008 Jun 17;51(24):2339-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.019. PMID: 18549920.
  14. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Jaguszewski M, Siddique A, Vogt S, Haller RB, Halioua R, Handzic A, Kaufmann PA, Corti R, Lüscher TF, Templin C. Impact of inflammation on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown).2013 Nov;14(11):807-14. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283609350. PMID: 23572059.
  15. Oltrona L, Ottani F, Galvani M; Italian Working Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology and the Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO). Clinical significance of a single measurement of troponin-I and C-reactive protein at admission in 1773 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J.2004 Sep;148(3):405-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.03.023. PMID: 15389226.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Evaluation of Thyroid Dysfunction in PCOD
Published: 31/03/2025
Research Article
Real-World Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcified Below-the-Knee Arteries
...
Published: 01/04/2025
Case Report
Idiopathic Acute Suppurative Thyroiditis with Thyroid Abscess in A Child: A Case Report
...
Published: 04/03/2025
Research Article
Role of Endothelial Dysfunction in the Progression of Hypertension: A Biomarker-Based Study
...
Published: 12/03/2025
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice