Contents
pdf Download PDF
pdf Download XML
253 Views
18 Downloads
Share this article
Research Article | Volume 10 Issue 2 (July-December, 2024) | Pages 447 - 453
Study of Factors Precipitating Hepatic Encephalopathy in Chronic Liver Disease
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
1
Associate Professor and Head of Unit, Department of General Medicine, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri Nanded
2
Junior resident 3, Department of General Medicine, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri Nanded
3
Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri Nanded
4
Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri Nanded
5
Junior Resident 3, Department of General Medicine, Dr Shankarrao Chavan Government Medical College, Vishnupuri Nanded
Under a Creative Commons license
Open Access
Received
Oct. 2, 2024
Revised
Oct. 23, 2024
Accepted
Nov. 15, 2024
Published
Nov. 30, 2024
Abstract

Background: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe neuropsychiatric complication of chronic liver disease (CLD) caused by impaired detoxification and neurotoxin accumulation. Various factors like infections, GI bleeding, and electrolyte imbalances can trigger HE. This study aimed to analyze the clinical profile, identify precipitating factors, and assess their impact on patient outcomes. Methods: A hospital-based descriptive study was conducted on 440 patients with cirrhosis of the liver presenting with HE over 18 months. Clinical history, investigations, and treatment details were recorded. HE was graded using the West Haven criteria, and cirrhosis severity was assessed using the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. Results: The median age of patients was 46.3 years, with a male predominance (88.8%). Alcoholism was the most common cause of cirrhosis (60%). The leading precipitating factors were constipation (45%), melena (32.9%), hematemesis (28%), hyponatremia (23.6%), and infections (17.5%). Disorientation (75.9%) and confusion (75.6%) were the most common symptoms, while asterixis (74%), pedal edema (62%), icterus (60%), ascites (60.6%), and pallor (59%) were the most common signs. The majority of patients were in Child-Pugh Class C (60%), with a higher mortality rate (91.03%). Most cases were classified as Grade III (30%) or IV (27.95%) HE. Patients with more than two precipitating factors had the highest mortality (62.5%). Conclusion: Hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients is frequently triggered by preventable factors such as upper GI bleeding, infections, electrolyte imbalances, and constipation. Health education, infection control, regular upper GI endoscopy, judicious use of diuretics and sedatives, and dietary modifications are essential for reducing HE incidence and mortality. Early recognition and management of precipitating factors can significantly improve patient outcomes.

Keywords
INTRODUCTION

Liver diseases remain a major health concern in developing countries like India, with a rising burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) impacting the economy. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), also known as portosystemic encephalopathy, is a severe complication of chronic liver disease, characterized by altered mental status and cognitive dysfunction. It is reversible with early diagnosis and treatment but significantly impacts quality of life and survival. Nearly 70% of patients have subtle symptoms, while 30-45% of cirrhotic individuals develop overt HE.1 Ammonia, produced by gut bacteria, is processed by the liver, but impaired clearance due to portosystemic shunting leads to hyperammonemia. Hepatic encephalopathy results from neurotoxic accumulation in the blood and brain. The correlation between ammonia levels and HE severity is inconsistent. Other contributing factors include false neurotransmitters and mercaptans. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy presents with subtle symptoms, detectable only through specialized tests.2,3

 

Hepatic encephalopathy is diagnosed clinically, requiring a skilled physician to recognize its varied symptoms. Patients may present with confusion, personality changes, aggression, or excessive drowsiness. In severe cases, it can progress to hepatic coma, which may be fatal. Identifying precipitating factors is crucial for timely management. Asterixis, or "liver flap," is a common finding in hepatic encephalopathy, induced by asking patients to extend their arms and bend their wrists back. The West Haven criteria are widely used for grading HE. While ammonia levels are often elevated, they are not a reliable diagnostic marker. Most HE episodes in cirrhotic patients result from identifiable precipitating factors or spontaneous portosystemic shunting.4

 

Common precipitating factors of hepatic encephalopathy include GI bleeding, infections, hypovolemia, azotemia, constipation, electrolyte imbalance, and high protein intake, with infections and GI bleeding being the most frequent. Management involves ruling out other causes, identifying triggers, and assessing response to empirical treatment. Lactulose and rifaximin, approved by the FDA, help reduce ammonia production and absorption. Early detection and prompt management of precipitating factors are crucial for better patient outcomes.5,6 Therefore this study aimed to analyze the clinical profile of HE in cirrhosis, identify precipitating factors, and assess their correlation with outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital-based descriptive study was conducted over 18 months (August 2022 to February 2024) on 440 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) using a complete enumeration method. Following ethical committee approval, patients aged 18–60 years with cirrhosis and HE symptoms were included, while those with acute CNS infections, neuropsychiatric disorders, acute alcoholic intoxication, alcohol withdrawal, fulminant hepatitis, or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension were excluded. Data collection involved clinical history, drug usage, alcohol intake, and neurological and abdominal signs. HE was graded using the West Haven criteria, and cirrhosis severity was assessed using the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. Investigations included CBC, renal function tests, serum electrolytes, LFT, coagulation profile, PT-INR, serum proteins, ultrasound, viral markers (HBsAg, Anti-HCV), and ascitic fluid analysis. Patients were followed throughout hospitalization, with outcomes recorded. Data was collected using a predesigned questionnaire covering socio-demographics, clinical history, diagnosis, and treatment. Standard investigations were performed, and results were analysed.

 

Statistical Analysis

Data were compiled using descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel 2019. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software. Qualitative data was represented in the form of frequency and percentage.

 

RESULTS

Most of the patients belong to the age group of 41 to 50 years (37.9%) followed by age group of 51 to 60 years (25.0%) with median age of 46.3 years with male predominance (88.8%) as shown in table 1.

Table 1: Demographic data of patients

Parameters

Number

Percentage

Age group

(Years)

21-30

44

10.0

31-40

88

20.0

41-50

167

37.9

51-60

110

25.0

>60

31

7.04

Gender

Male

391

88.8

Female

49

11.1

Disorientation (75.9%), confusion (75.6%) and abdominal symptom (69.0%) were the commonest presenting symptoms. The commonest signs were asterixis (74%), pedal oedema (62%), icterus (60%), ascites (60.6%) and pallor (59.0%), (Table 2).

Table 2: Presenting sign and symptoms

Sign and symptoms

Numberofcases

Percentage

Symptoms

Fever

75

17

Vomiting

88

20

Diarrhoea

101

22.9

Constipation

198

45

Abdominalsymptom

304

69

Hemetemesis

124

28.1

Malaena

145

32.9

Sleepdisturbances

256

58.1

Disorientation

334

75.9

Confusion

333

75.6

Coma

97

22

Signs

Dehydration

57

12.9

Pallor

260

59

Icterus

264

60

Pedaledema

273

62

Clubbing

5

1.1

Asterixis

326

74

FetorHepaticus

51

11.5

Ascites

267

60.6

Splenomegaly

198

45

Increasedprotein

66

15

Table3: Mortalityaccordingtovarious study parameters

Study parameters

Numberofcases

Mortality

Precipitating factors

Hemetemesis

124

25

Malaena

145

28

Infection

77

10

Constipation

198

30

Proteinexcess

66

9

Sedatives

44

7

Diuretics

33

8

NA(<135)

104

10

K (<35)

27

5

No of precipitating factors

1

141

66

2

251

36

>2

48

30

CHILD PUGH score

A

110

0

B

66

0

C

264

132

WEST HAVEN classification

I

123

0

II

62

0

III

132

21

IV

123

111

30% of patients experienced mortality, while 70% survived. This indicates a relatively high survival rate among the patients studied, (Table 4).

Table 4: Mortality rate

Mortality

No.of patients

Percentages

Yes

132

30

No

308

70

Total

440

100

DISCUSSION

The identification and treatment of the precipitating factor is the most important aspect of the management of acute HE since symptoms of overt HE are debilitating and lead to non-adherence to a therapeutic regimen, which, in turn, leads to severe symptoms, frequent hospitalizations, and poor quality of life.7 In the present study, the majority of patients were found to have HE in their 4th and 5th decades of life. Similar findings were observed by Barbosa M. et al8, who reported that most HE patients were in their 5th decade of life. Groeneweg et al9also stated that chronic liver disease patients who developed hepatic encephalopathy were elderly. The male predominant population in this study is likely due to the risk of chronic alcohol use as a cause of liver disease which was consistent with other studies.9,10

 

The major cause of hepatic encephalopathy was alcohol usage, constituting about 60% of the total cases. Viral hepatitis and other unknown causes constituted to about 20% in each. Duah A et al also found that the cause of liver cirrhosis was significant alcohol consumption and hepatitis B virus in 44.9% and 43.7% of the cases.11 Poudyal NS et al also found the most common cause of chronic liver disease to be alcohol - 114 (86%), followed by hepatitis B virus - nine (7%).12

 

The most common precipitating factors in the present study were constipation (45%), malena (32.9%) and haematemesis in 28% of the cases. Similar findings were noticed by Maqsood S.et al13and VeeraballiS. et al.14

60% of the subjects in our study showed CHILD-PUGH score belonging to “C” category. Similar findings were noticed by Maqsood S. et al13where they found 62% of the subjects with “C” CHILD PUGH score. Another study by Mumtaz K. et al shows similar findings of 78% population belonging to class C Child pugh score.15 Majority of population in current study falls under West Haven grade 3(30% of the population) followed by grade 4 (28% of the population) and grade 1(28% of the population. In a study conducted by Maqsood S. et al13,52% of the population belongs to West haven grade 3 and 22% of the population belongs to West Haven grade 4. Similar findings were present in a study conducted by Raphael KC et al16where 36.4% of population belonging to West Haven grade 3 and 18.2% of the population belonging to West Haven grade 4.

 

The mortality rate in the present study accounts to 30% of the population. Study done by Y M Al-Gindan et al17 has findings with mortality rate of 41% in a population of 51. Another study conducted by Maqsood S. et al13 has similar mortality rate of 30%. Raphael KC et al16study in 2016 reveals mortality rate of 75%.In the present study carried out on the population of 440, 132 patients expired due to Hepatic Encephalopathy and 13 patients expired due to other unexplained causes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication in liver cirrhosis, often triggered by factors such as upper GI bleeding, infections, diuretics, electrolyte imbalances, and constipation. Raising awareness among cirrhotic patients about these risks is essential. Preventive measures, including timely infection control, regular GI monitoring, proper laxative use, cautious administration of sedatives and diuretics, and appropriate dietary guidance, should be integral to patient care. Early identification and management of precipitating factors can significantly reduce mortality and improve outcomes.

REFERENCES
  1. Poordad FF. Review article: the burden of hepatic encephalopathy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.2007;25 Suppl 1:3-9.
  2. Qureshi MO, Khokhar N, Shafqat F. Ammonia levels and the severity of hepatic encephalopathy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24(3):160-3.
  3. Hadjihambi A, Arias N, Sheikh M, Jalan R. Hepatic encephalopathy: a critical current review. Hepatology international. 2017;12(Suppl 1):135-47.
  4. Vilstrup H, Amodio P, Bajaj J, Cordoba J, Ferenci P, Mullen KD et al. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: 2014 Practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver. Hepatology. 2014 Aug;60(2):715-35.
  5. Poudyal NS, Chaudhary S, Kc S, Paudel BN, Basnet BK, Mandal A et al. Precipitating Factors and Treatment Outcomes of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis. Cureus. 2019 Apr 2;11(4):e4363.
  6. Sethuraman VK, Balasubramanian K. Clinical spectrum of precipitatingfactors of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis of liver and its relation to prognosis in a tertiary care hospital – aretrospective study. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2019;4(2):B65-B70.
  7. Blei AT, Bircher J, Benhamou JP, McIntyre N, Rizzetto M, Rodés J: Hepatic encephalopathy. Oxford Textbook of Clinical Hepatology. Neil McIntyre, Jean-Pierre Benhamou, Johannes Bircher, Mario Rizzetto, Juan Rodes (ed): Oxford Medical, Oxford; 1998. 765-783.
  8. Barbosa M, Marinho C, Mota P, Cotter J. Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy: Нe Reality Beyond Our Eyes. Acta Med Port 2015;28: 480-485
  9. Groeneweg M, Moerland W, Quero JC, Hop WC, Krabbe PF, Schalm SW. Screening of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. J hepatol. 2000;32(5):748-53.
  10. Bamidele OF, Olokoba AB, Bojuwoye MO, Akintayo RO, Bamidele O. Prevalence of minimal hepatic encephalopathy among patients with chronic liver disease in Ilorin, Nigeria. Ghana Med J. 2019 Dec;53(4):299-303.
  11. Duah A, Agyei-Nkansah A, Osei-Poku F, Duah F, Ampofo-Boobi D, Peprah B. The Prevalence, Predictors, and In-Hospital Mortality of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis Admitted at St. Dominic Hospital in Akwatia, Ghana. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Dec 22;2020:8816522.
  12. Poudyal N S, Chaudhary S, Kc S, et al. Precipitating Factors and Treatment Outcomes of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis. Cureus 2019;11(4): e4363.
  13. Maqsood S, Saleem A, Iqbal A, Butt JA. Precipitating factors of hepatic encephalopathy: experience at Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences Islamabad. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2006 Oct-Dec;18(4):58-62
  14. Sindhusha Veeraballi. Clinical Spectrum of Precipitating Factors of Hepatic Encephalopathy in Cirrhosis of the Liver. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2019;18(9): 43-47.
  15. Mumtaz K, Ahmed US, Abid S, Baig N, Hamid S, Jafri W. Precipitating factors and the outcome of hepatic encephalopathy in liver cirrhosis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Aug;20(8):514-8.
  16. Raphael KC, Matuja SS, Shen NT, Liwa AC, Jaka H. Hepatic Encephalopathy; Prevalence, Precipitating Factors and Challenges of Management in a Resource-Limited Setting. J Gastrointest Dig Syst 2016;6: 441
  17. Al-Gindan YM. Hepatic encephalopathy in Saudi Arabia: retrospective analysis of 51 patients. Indian J Med Sci. 1992 Mar;46(3):69-74.

 

Recommended Articles
Research Article
Effect of Maternal Haemoglobin on Birth Weight And APGAR Score Of Neonate
...
Published: 04/08/2025
Research Article
Comparative Study of Fetal Weight Estimation by Johnson Formula, DARE’A Formula and HADLOCK Formula
Published: 04/08/2025
Research Article
Anemia in Rural Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study of Prevalence and Associated Socio-Demographic Factors
Published: 04/08/2025
Research Article
School-Based Participatory Health Education and Menstrual Hygiene Management Outcomes among Adolescent Girls: A Cluster-Controlled Study from Rural India
Published: 04/08/2025
Chat on WhatsApp
© Copyright Journal of Contemporary Clinical Practice